Navigate KTM
Kitchen Table MathKTM User PagesService Groups
Parent Groups
Personal PagesBlogs
Special listsHelp |
02 Sep 2006 - 13:30
ACT scores 2006NOTE: IF YOU ARE READING THIS POST AT THE TOP OF AN ARCHIVED MONTH OR CATEGORY THREAD, BE FOREWARNED THAT A NUMBER OF THE POSTS SHOW UP INCORRECTLY. IF THERE ARE MISSING WORDS OR IMAGES, CLICK ON THE POST TITLE & READ IT IN A SEPARATE WINDOW. (SORRY!) Christian is so proud of his reading score on the Accuplacer test. It's good to see. He should be proud. He went through Yonkers schools, graduated with an IEP diploma - the diploma Jimmy and presumably Andrew will earn - and he's reading at college level. That puts him ahead of half the kids taking the ACT this year: Despite the increases, the results suggest that the majority of ACT-tested graduates are still likely to struggle in first-year college math and science courses. Our meeting with the special ed attorney was an eye-opener. More on that later. (Preview: it's always worse than you think.) In the meantime, you might want to read Gerry Garibaldi's article on boys and school in City Journal (Ben Calvin linked to this a little while back I think): The notion of male ethical inferiority first arises in grammar school, where women make up the overwhelming majority of teachers. It’s here that the alphabet soup of supposed male dysfunctions begins. And make no mistake: while girls occasionally exhibit symptoms of male-related disorders in this world, females diagnosed with learning disabilities simply don’t exist. For a generation now, many well-meaning parents, worn down by their boy’s failure to flourish in school, his poor self-esteem and unhappiness, his discipline problems, decide to accept administration recommendations to have him tested for disabilities. The pitch sounds reasonable: admission into special ed qualifies him for tutoring, modified lessons, extra time on tests (including the SAT), and other supposed benefits. It’s all a hustle, Mom and Dad privately advise their boy. Don’t worry about it. We know there’s nothing wrong with you. To get into special ed, however, administrators must find something wrong. In my four years of teaching, I’ve never seen them fail. In the first IEP (Individualized Educational Program) meeting, the boy and his parents learn the results of disability testing. When the boy hears from three smiling adults that he does indeed have a learning disability, his young face quivers like Jell-O. For him, it was never a hustle. From then on, however, his expectations of himself—and those of his teachers—plummet. Special ed is the great spangled elephant in the education parade. Each year, it grows larger and more lumbering, drawing more and more boys into the procession. Since the publication of Sommers’s book, it has grown tenfold. Special ed now is the single largest budget item, outside of basic operations, in most school districts across the country. Special-ed boosters like to point to the success that boys enjoy after they begin the program. Their grades rise, and the phone calls home cease. Anxious parents feel reassured that progress is happening. In truth, I have rarely seen any real improvement in a student’s performance after he’s become a special-ed kid. -- CatherineJohnson - 02 Sep 2006 Back to main page. CommentsAfter entering a comment, users can login anonymously as KtmGuest (password: guest) when prompted.Please consider registering as a regular user. Look here for syntax help.
| ||||||||||