Navigate KTM
Kitchen Table MathKTM User PagesService Groups
Parent Groups
Personal PagesBlogs
Special listsHelp |
22 Dec 2005 - 18:56
call for writing quirksAnnouncing an unofficial poll of writing quirks. Here's what we've got so far: ![]() Here's Carolyn's version: ![]() Carolyn used an open source thing called VYM (visualize your mind) for diagramming. I used Inspiration, which is the adult version of Kidspiration. Rapid Problem Solving with Post-It Notes I'm seriously considering dumping the fancy-schmancy graphical organizer and going to a bulletin board, index cards, and push-pins. Or else Post-It Notes. ![]() Back to main page. CommentsAfter entering a comment, users can login anonymously as KtmGuest (password: guest) when prompted.Please consider registering as a regular user. Look here for syntax help. HERE WE GO: As the author of this unusual book explains, most problems consist of 'chunks' of information, and identifying and manipulating these chunks can lead us to a solution. Post-it Notes provide the ideal medium for this process: they can hold information, they stay where they're put and they can be combined and rearranged to reflect further analysis. They are particularly suited to group problem-solving, where both the information and the process need to be shared.-- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 Clearly, I need to solve my problems rapidly with Post-It Notes. -- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 I'm buying the book. fyi -- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 from Amazon: This book is a real wonder. In a very friendly way, and without resorting to any technology beyond sticky notes, it introduces several concepts of computer science and systems engineering. It can be used as a brainstorming tool, but it can also be used by us programmers as a gift to the non-programmers in our lives. It can serve as an exposition of what it is we do all day when we aren't cursing irritating APIs and OS misfeatures. This is about the part of our jobs that we love and that we have so much trouble explaining. I'm delighted it's still in print. I love oddball books in general, and this is a great example. It really delivers much more than it claims to. Don't hesitate for a minute to buy this one.-- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 It looks really fascinating! Low-tech is definitely the way to go. -- CarolynJohnston - 22 Dec 2005 View Your Mind -- SmartestTractor - 22 Dec 2005 Rapid Problem Solving with Post-It Notes Who publishes it? 3M? -- KDeRosa - 22 Dec 2005 And BTW, I am quirkless. -- KDeRosa - 22 Dec 2005 Windows Version of View Your Mind The link above is for a MAC. -- SmartestTractor - 22 Dec 2005 And BTW, I am quirkless no -- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 RUTHless, not QUIRKless -- CarolynJohnston - 22 Dec 2005 and sometimes brainless -- KDeRosa - 22 Dec 2005 and sometimes brainless ok, that I have yet to see -- CatherineJohnson - 22 Dec 2005 talk to my wife -- KDeRosa - 22 Dec 2005 that won't be necessary -- CatherineJohnson - 23 Dec 2005 the whole point of being married is to behave brainlessly with your spouse, as far as I can tell -- CatherineJohnson - 23 Dec 2005 and that's on a good day -- CatherineJohnson - 23 Dec 2005 and, uh, the term 'spouse' includes both parties -- CatherineJohnson - 23 Dec 2005 A Handbook of Rhetorical Devices somebody must have left this link this website looks cool -- CatherineJohnson - 24 Dec 2005 WOW! Now I'll have to learn all those. -- CarolynJohnston - 24 Dec 2005 back in Studio City I had a 'tea group'—4 friends from the neighborhood—we used to tell 'stupid husband stories' (no stupid wife stories...) The best one ever was the one about the husband (someone's uncle, I think) who liked to read the newspaper with a magnifying glass while sitting under a skylight he finally set himself on fire doing that -- CatherineJohnson - 24 Dec 2005 "somebody must have left this link" I think that was me on the sentence diagramming thread. I was looking for the name of a particular rhetorical device that I decided not to use in the comment, but thought the link interesting enough to use. -- DougSundseth - 25 Dec 2005 I think that was me on the sentence diagramming thread. I was looking for the name of a particular rhetorical device that I decided not to use in the comment, but thought the link interesting enough to use. now I'm totally confused...... -- CatherineJohnson - 25 Dec 2005 Rewrite. 8-) At one point in my reply, I was planning to mention some rhetorical device or other (apophis?), that could be overused. So I looked up "rhetorical devices" in google and found the link you noticed. In the end, I didn't like the way the comment was working out, so I deleted that part, but still found the link interesting enough to include it as a hyperlink for "rhetorical devices" in the comment. -- DougSundseth - 27 Dec 2005
| ||||||||||